The third session of our listening journey presented the
Preludes and Fugues in D-major and D-minor from the WTC 1.
I was a little uneasy about my decision to discuss the
pieces in order, because it put the fugue in d-minor at the end of the session.
Technically, it’s not very challenging, but there is something edgy, almost
tormented about the music. It’s not a crowd-pleaser, not an easy piece to
listen to, and analysis remained the only way I could think of to demonstrate
Bach’s supreme craftsmanship in weaving the piece together.
My greatest challenge in guiding the audience through the
pieces on our journey is to imagine what they might sound like to listeners who
hear them for the first time. I can’t even remember my own first listening
experience. It’s impossible to recall it in my imagination after exploring the
music thoroughly in the course of learning to play it, and living with it for a
long time.
I try to fill those presentations with “life” as much as
possible, in order to illustrate what happens in the music through analogies
that are accessible to a general audience. I had found a few “bells and
whistles” to illustrate the Prelude and Fugue in D-major:
a video of a “Pendulum wave” for the
Prelude,
a video of Händel’s Music for the Royal
Fireworks, with showers of sparks illuminating the night sky
for the
Fugue in D-major, and a video of the Jacques Loussier Trio,
presenting a Jazz improvisation of that fugue on Leipzig’s market square, part
of the festivities on the occasion of the 250th anniversary of
Bach’s death in 2000.
Jacques Loussier, 1934-2019 |
The falling leaves swirling all around us in late November created a perfect illustration for the swirling notes in the right hand of the D-minor Prelude,
but the fugue in D-minor stubbornly resisted my efforts to make
the discussion attractive. At the end of the day at the end of the week, Friday
7pm- 8pm. “If everybody is fast asleep by the time we get finished, I can’t help
it,” I said to a student who played both pieces last year.
I had underestimated the enthusiasm of the dedicated
audience, assembled at the Ethical Culture Society that evening. More than 20
people – the largest crowd we’ve had so far – not only followed the
presentation with great interest, but stayed on after the end of the session to
discuss additional questions. Thank you, every one for coming, and please, come
again. And then we talked some more over refreshments, generously provided by
Terri Suess and served by Marshall Norstein, which goes far beyond his tasks as
building manager. Thank you both, Terri and Marshall, and thank you, everyone
at Ethical who is helping with this project. It’s a joy to make it happen,
inspired by your support.
For readers who find the script of my presentation of the individual
pieces too challenging or tedious to follow without the sound examples, I’m
putting my concluding remarks first in this blog. That way, you have some
introduction and you can click on the link in the text to listen to the pieces
on youtube, if you like. All recordings come with the marked score that
illustrates items pointed out in the discussion. A more detailed discussion of
each piece follows after the general remarks.
Prelude and Fugue in
D-major and D-minor – contrast and balance.
In the Preludes and Fugues in D-major and D-minor we
encounter ways of joining together opposites.
At the core of the Prelude
in D-major is a pattern that consists of two motifs that complement each
other. The second is the inversion of the first, there’s a balance between
them.
Bach combines this perpetual motion prelude with a fugue
whose basic rhythmic impulse is stop-and-go – the dotted rhythm, that’s at the
core of the subject of the Fugue in
D-major.
In the course of the fugue
he abandons the subject as it appears in the beginning and separates its two
elements - the initial turn and the dotted rhythm. If you look at the
proportions of the sections throughout the piece, however, they’re of equal
length – two subject entries are balanced by two elements of a sequence in the
first episode. The accumulation of subject entries in M 11-16 has exactly the
same length as the following long episode. Two measures dominated by the turn
(first element of the subject) are followed by two measures dominated by the dotted
rhythm (second element of subject). While the elements of the subject are
eventually separated, the “big picture” reveals a concept of balance.
The Prelude in
D-minor is a very energetic and somewhat “unruly” piece.
Melodic lines hide
between the patterns of broken triads in the right hand. They frequently show
up “off-beat”, seemingly at random, always trying to escape from the melodic
lines of the “walking bass” in the left hand, as if refusing to be tethered
down.
The Fugue in D-minor undertakes the challenging
task of weaving opposites together, getting them to cooperate.
The subject asks
a troubled question. It changes its shape many times; it feels undecided,
alternating between major and minor thirds. It turns this way and that, even
upside down. I like to think of inversion – as the technique is called - as the
other point of view in an argument between two opponents.
In the coda, Bach joins the first idea of the subject
together with the inversion of that idea, synchronized in time. He uses the
major third, and the piece ends in a major chord. A friend once gave me this
little card with a quote by Heraclitus:
Discussion of the individual pieces
The Prelude in D-major is a “perpetual motion” piece. The
ups and downs of the pitches in the right hand create a melodic pattern. Once
it is set in motion, it never stops. The
pattern consists of two groups of four 16th notes. They do not
coincide with the way the 16th are grouped together, by the way.
The first impulse consists of three rising steps, followed
by a drop down. The second is just the opposite: three falling steps, followed
by a leap upwards. Those two motifs complement each other; in fact, the second
is the inversion of the first. That creates a feeling of balance. A gap
separates the two motifs throughout the piece. Sometimes it’s as small as a
third, at other times as large as a 7th, but it’s always there.
We may not be conscious of it, but we feel the key changes
throughout the piece. We also sense the places where the melody reaches a
harmonic destination, supported by the single notes in the left hand that are
like the pushes you give a swing to keep it moving.
In the course of the piece, we get to visit the harmonies of
steps I-VI of the D-major scale – I: D (M3) – V: A (M6) – III: F-sharp minor
(M10) – II: E-minor (M12) – VI: B-minor (M18 – note the long transition to this
point) and finally IV: G(M 20) At this point, Bach quotes M 1-6 of the Prelude.
It’s the same section of the piece, but the lower register makes it feel more
mellow than the bright opening. The
modulation in M 22-24 brings us back to the initial key of D-major.
The final part of the Prelude is a grand finale. Harmonically, it solidifies the key with a long pedal point in A-major, the dominant. Gradually, Bach starts to abandon the melodic pattern (M 30/31) The piece merges into a free improvisation that prepares us for something great: the fugue.
The final part of the Prelude is a grand finale. Harmonically, it solidifies the key with a long pedal point in A-major, the dominant. Gradually, Bach starts to abandon the melodic pattern (M 30/31) The piece merges into a free improvisation that prepares us for something great: the fugue.
Pendulum Wave Toy |
If I heard this music, not knowing the piece, I’d never
think it’s a fugue, because with fugue, we associate a network of independent
voices. What catches the ear in this piece is the distinct chordal structure.
Of course one always tends to forget that chords are the intersection of
melodic lines. We get the impression of chords in this fugue whenever the
separate voices move at the same time. The most striking example is the coda.
What we perceive as chords are independent melodies that move in the same
rhythm.
note the tenor (marked blue) rising higher than the alto in the second measure |
In the last four measures of the fugue Bach isolates the two elements that make up
the subject: the dotted rhythm and the quick turn that precedes it. The turn is
really an embellishment of the dotted rhythm. It creates continuous motion, like a start-up that harnesses
energy for the leap upwards (6th) that is so characteristic for this
subject.
The dotted rhythm is characteristic for a baroque form we
call French Ouverture: A piece that
begins with a slow introduction dominated by this rhythmic idea, followed by a
quick and lively section, often a fugue. The character associated with this
kind of opening is festive, grandeur, dignity, splendor, lots of light and
color. Rather than turn to one of Bach’s compositions in this form, we listened
to the opening of Händel’s Music for the Royal
Fireworks. The key of D-major suits trumpets perfectly. At times,
Händel creates a question-and-answer structure between different groups of
instruments. Bach employs a similar structure between groups of voices in the
episodes.
The D-major fugue is set for four
parts. First, we’ll follow the subject. In the course of the
exposition it rises consecutively from the lowest to the highest voice. The
next two entries are in bass and soprano, modulating to b-minor. Then, in M
11-15, it appears five times. In
addition, the bass has two sort of “fake” entries (M 11 and 13). Strictly
speaking, they don’t qualify as entries, because there are slight changes in
the melodic structure, but they retain the rhythmic structure, especially that
initial turn. I think that dominates in the aural impression we get.
In this section one subject entry immediately follows the
next, as if the initial turn lighted the fuse that shoots one fireworks rocket
after another into the sky.
After that, the subject is burnt out. It never appears again
in its complete form. The fugue ends with a long episode and the coda.
The opposite of the dotted rhythm is continuously flowing
motion – the prelude is an example of that. Of course, the dotted rhythm
develops its own kind of continuity when its elements are repeated, but it
never looses that “limp.”
In the episodes Bach separates the elements of the subject –
the turn and the repeated notes/dotted rhythm and, by dissolving the dotted
rhythm into a continuous pattern of 16th notes, he creates a
continuum of motion between two voices: that smoothes the effect of the dotted
rhythm that is still present in two voices, often in the middle register.
The coda once again presents both elements of the fugue.
Once he’s taken it apart, Bach never puts the subject back together again. For
all I know, this is the only fugue in the entire WTC where that happens. The Jacques Loussier Trio takes elements of
the fugue as the basis for their Jazz improvisation.
Jacques Loussier, 1934-2019 |
Here’s another “perpetual motion” piece, but it’s very
different from the D-major Prelude. There, the momentum appears steady,
measured, controlled. The D-minor Prelude moves forward in a continuous surge
of energy and constant restlessness.
If D-major evokes the image of a pendulum,
this one reminds me of a leaf-blower, or leaves caught in a corner, twirled
round and round by the wind.
The pattern is based on broken triads, a three-note pattern
in triplets. It opens with the cadence harmonies in d-minor, all the while
supported by a repeated d (pedal point) in the left hand.
A huge leap in M 2 marks a new beginning. A sequence
follows, descending at first, then rising, while the pattern is shortened – it
sounds more urgent this way. It
reaches its peak on a high C and then descends more than two octaves – where we
find ourselves in the key of F-major.
This opening contains features that will become more poignant
in the course of the piece. The accompaniment has the manner of a walking bass”
in Jazz: at a medium tempo, it ascends and descends stepwise, one note to each
beat. Bach builds the energy gradually in this piece, from the initial repeated
notes to the bounces that follow, to the continuous bass line that emerges in M
4.
Hidden melody lines that shine through the pattern in the
right hand are the second feature. They’re very subtle at the beginning, but
you do get a line if you connect the peak notes of each phrase in M 2-4.
As the piece progresses, those lines are everywhere (see
marked notes in the score) The tricky thing is: they’re mostly “off beat” and
thank heavens for the walking bass in the left hand that keeps the pace. They
continue throughout the second part of the Prelude, while the bass gets a little
more static. The pedal point d is like a leash for the RH in M 16-20. Then, a 3rd
voice is introduced: additional harmony notes support the walking bass lines. All
the while, the RH follows its own path.
In the last two lines, there’s one more sweep up, before the
RH triplets sink down in half steps as diminished triads before a big cadence
ends the piece - all the leaves are in the bag.
There’s something dark and brooding, almost tormented about
this fugue. This music is not trying to charm or please. At the same time, it’s
most exquisitely crafted. Everything that happens in the fabric that the voices
weave together is related in one way or other to the subject.
The subject consists of three motifs. It begins on the first note of the scale and ends on the fifth –
the musical equivalent of an open question. You would expect the third subject
entry in M 6 to mark the end of the exposition. Every voice has now had the
subject once in this fugue in 3 parts.
The 3rd entry is immediately followed by a
fourth, however. It has the same overall melodic shape and rhythmic structure,
but it starts on a different step of the scale. That changes the intervals
(distances) between the melody notes and makes the melody sound different –
quite disturbing, actually. The harmony of d-minor shines through the moving
voices that accompany the last note, but the feeling of resolution is obscured
and immediately swept away by the motion in the left hand in the following episode.
This section sounds quite mellow initially, but the ending
only underscores the initial questioning character of the subject. IN M 12,
Bach splits the subject, combining its 2nd and 3rd motifs
in the bass with the inversion of the first motif in the middle voice. The tied
b-flat in the soprano adds a jarring suspension on the first beat of M 13.
Stretto 1 The
inversion foreshadows what is to come in the first stretto immediately
afterwards. The subject in the soprano overlaps with the inversion of the
subject. The counterpoint in the bass underscores the dramatic character of the
section.
Stretto 2 A
second stretto follows. Two subject entries in bass and alto overlap. They are
not exactly the same; Bach alternates between the major and the minor third. This kind of change takes place
throughout the entire piece - almost as if the subject were in search of its
own identity. At the end, all three voices come together in the single note a, undefined
in terms of major/minor.
The second part mirrors the first in terms of the “dramatic”
development and structure. What’s new:
the idea of “inversion” – turning the subject and its elements upside
down plays a significant part.
Stretto 3 The
part begins with a stretto that combines the subject and the inversion.
Inversion dominates, and continues into the following episode.
Stretto 4 This
open ending leads into another stretto. It again combines subject and inversion
– this time, the subject is placed 2nd and in the middle voice. This
is the only time after the exposition where the subject is exactly the same as at
the beginning of the piece.
Episode 3 is very
similar to E1. Things calm down. Again, the last measure splits up the motifs
of the subject, but the first motif is not inverted. Harmonically, it turns to
the tonic (I), not the dominant (V) - the resolution to the question. (To feel the difference, play M 12/13 and M
33/34 back to back)
Stretto 5 Two
subject entries overlap in this stretto. The second entry is incomplete and leads
into an episode where the tension clearly rises – note the sequence of motif 1,
inverted, in the left hand.
Stretto 6 Two
subject entries overlap – alternating major/minor 3rd, as in Stretto
3 that concluded 1st part,
Coda: after so
much darkness and tension, the ending in major may come as a surprise: Bach
combines the first motif of the subject – in major - with its inversion. Additional
voices support the impression of harmonies, rather than independently moving
voices.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete